Basic Liability Rules in Tort Claims

Bookmark and Share

A tort is an action or omission that results in injury to another person. Under certain circumstances when a tort occurs, the victim has a legal right to sue for his injuries (damages). The various liability rules in tort claims require specific information for building a strong personal injury case.

The Rules of Liability

Three circumstances must be present to succeed in an injury claim:

  1. The party responsible for the accident must have had a legal duty to act in a manner which would have prevented the injury.

  2. The party failed to act in that manner, breaching his duty.

  3. As a result of the breach of duty, someone is injured and suffers damages.

Types of Torts in Accident Cases

There are three types of torts in accident cases:

  1. Negligent
  2. Intentional
  3. Strict liability

Negligent Torts

A negligent tort occurs when a person has a duty of care to protect someone from harm and fails to act in a way that supports that duty. As a result, the person who was supposed to be protected is injured.

Example of negligent harm

A person is texting while driving. Because he is not paying attention to road conditions, he fails to stop at a red light in time to avoid colliding with the car in front of him. The collision causes injury to the driver in the front car.

The texting driver had a duty to drive responsibly. He breached that duty and someone was injured. His action wasn't intentional. It was negligent.

Intentional Torts

An intentional tort occurs due to the fact that a person has a legal duty not to intentionally harm another person. When someone ignores that duty and purposely injures another person, his actions are intentional. These cases usually involve some element of criminal prosecution.

Example of intentional harm

Two men are arguing over a football game. Without provocation, one man decides to punch the other man in the face, breaking his orbital bone. The puncher had a legal duty not to harm the other man. He breached that duty when he intentionally punched him.

Strict Liability Torts

A strict liability tort occurs when a person or corporation has a legal duty to act safely and breaches that duty. Negligence and intention do not matter in strict liability cases. Proving the action or omission that caused the injury is enough.

Example of strict liability

An 18-wheeler truck carrying a load of heavy pipes is driving down the interstate at night. The legal weight capacity of the truck is 4,000 pounds, however the company that owns the truck is making the driver haul 5,000 pounds. The driver tries to make a turn and the extra weight causes the truck to topple. It crashes on top of a car, killing the car's driver. The driver of the car had poor eyesight and had a restriction against driving at night on his driver's license.

In a case like this, the fact that the car's driver shouldn't have been driving at night is irrelevant. The truck driver never should have been carrying that extra weight. Comparative negligence (see more below) is irrelevant in strict liability cases. The company and truck driver are both strictly liable.

Proving Negligence

The first hour after an accident is the most important. If you're the victim of a car accident, you cannot presume the other driver will take responsibility for the accident. No matter how clear his liability may seem, you must protect your interests. Making the right decisions after an accident is vital to your claim, and proving liability requires taking action.

Tools for Building the Case

Building a strong liability case relies on the strength of the proof. Think of it as similar to building an impenetrable fortress. The stronger the materials you use, the more impenetrable your fortress will be. The four tools needed to build a strong case are:

When police officers respond to an accident scene, their first duty is to see if anyone is injured and call fire and rescue if necessary. Their next step is to secure the area around the scene to keep the involved people and witnesses safe and preserve the site. They also mark evidence and sometimes take photographs.

The Accident To-Do List

No one plans on being in an accident, but a little preparation can make a big difference. Create a to-do list of what you should do in case of an accident and keep it in your glove compartment or console.

Here's a free accident report form to make recording information easier after an accident.

If you're ever involved in an accident, this list will guide you through a step-by-step process to help you prove liability. Follow it, and you'll be sure to collect the information needed to prove the other driver's negligence.

  1. Call 911 and ask for police assistance.

  2. Get the other driver's contact and insurance information.

  3. Collect the names and contact information of witnesses. Have them write down what they saw. Ask them to date and sign it.

  4. Use a camera or your cell phone to photograph the scene. Include the position of the cars, any damage and debris that may have fallen off the cars, skid marks, and damages to anything else in the area, such as bent signs or dented guard rails.

  5. Ask one of the officers for the service number of the police report so you can get a copy in a few days.

  6. Write down other information you think will be helpful.

Traffic Tickets

Traffic tickets issued to an at-fault driver are extremely valuable in proving liability. The other evidence (witness statements, photographs and diagrams) are important tools, but a police report showing the other driver violated a traffic law can seal the deal.

Tickets for excessive speed, failing to yield, disobeying a traffic signal and entering an intersection can all help prove negligence. An at-fault driver will have a hard time overcoming the significance of a traffic ticket.

No-doubt Tort Claims

While traffic citations lend strong proof of liability in tort claims, they aren't absolute evidence of negligence. Certain types of accidents require little, if any, supplemental proof. These accidents are considered no-doubt liability. Here are some examples:

Rear-end collisions are seldom contested. That's because there are very few defenses to such collisions. (An at-fault driver can't make a believable excuse by saying a car suddenly appeared out of nowhere or purposely backed up so he could hit it.)

In this case, liability is usually clear and uncontestable, but you should always follow through as if liability was unclear. Some drivers are convinced they couldn't be responsible for any accident, ever. They blame the other driver for stopping too fast, or for having brake lights that weren't bright enough to see, or some other excuse.

Crossing-an-intersection collisions are also seldom contested. In 99 percent of these accidents, drivers heading in one direction down a roadway have the clear right of way. Collisions normally occur when a driver thinks he has time to cross an intersection before the other car gets there. This mistake in judgment can cause terrible crashes.

Drunk driving collisions are another type of accident that is seldom, if ever, contested. A driver arrested for driving while intoxicated or impaired has little credibility and no excuse.

Comparative Liability

Most states recognize some form of comparative liability, also referred to as comparative negligence. This means if you're in an accident and you have some fault, even if that fault is minor, your damages may be lessened proportionately.

Example of comparative negligence

A car is traveling down a road with a 35 mile per hour speed limit. The driver has the green light as he approaches an intersection, but suddenly a car heading in the opposite direction turns left in front of him. The other driver is trying to cut across the intersection, thinking he has enough time. The first driver slams on his brakes, but he's too close and there isn't enough time - the two cars collide.

Some witnesses stop to help. A few minutes later the police arrive and talk with both drivers. When they ask the first driver how fast he was going, he honestly states about 40 miles per hour. The police give the driver who turned a ticket for failing to yield at an intersection. They don't give the other driver a ticket because his speed was only slightly above the limit. They include the driver's statement that he admitted to traveling at five miles per hour over the speed limit in the police report.

The first driver's medical bills come to $1,000, and he wants at least $3,000 to settle the case (a reasonable amount). The insurance company responds that since he was speeding, he has some fault in the accident. They say their insured is 80 percent liable and the first driver is 20 percent liable. As a result they offer a settlement of $2,400, which is 80 percent of his demand. By claiming comparative negligence, the insurance company deducts 20 percent, or $600 dollars, from their offer.

How Much Is Your Case Worth?

Find out now with a FREE case review...

> > Establishing Liability

New! Comments...

Injury Settlement Guide logo