Workers Comp Lawsuit Asserting that Employer-Provided Housing Should Be
Included in Wage Compensation*
Case
Summary:
This is a review of a workers comp lawsuit filed
by an injured employee who was entitled to receive
partial wage reimbursement while recovering. The employee disagreed
with the reason upon which the insurance carrier based her partial wage
reimbursement.
The employee believed her partial wage
reimbursement
should be based on her salary plus a housing allowance paid on her
behalf by her employer. Taken together those amounts would
substantially increase her partial wage payout during her medical
leave.
The workers compensation insurance carrier
disagreed with the
employee's request. From that disagreement arose this workers comp
lawsuit.
Statement of Facts...
Jacqueline Tanga began her employment with
Quantity Services on
January 2nd, 2009. Quantity Services was a nationwide food service
company with offices in all 50 states. Their primary business was based
upon commercial catering and the bulk of their business was catering
for special events. Quantity employed 3,000 employees. Of those
employees, many were used as food servers during the special events.
Because some large events could not be supported
by Quantity's local
staff, Quantity Services often had their employees
transfer temporarily
from out of town to the site of the special event. When transferred,
the out-of-town
employees would be paid an additional amount of money
as a housing allowance.
Because the preparation for some of the events
sometimes took 4 to 5 months, the out-of-town employees mostly rented
hotel rooms, sometimes sleeping two to a room to save some of their
housing allowance.
Transfers were on a voluntary basis only. Because
some employees
enjoyed traveling to various parts of the country, Quantity Services
had little difficulty recruiting volunteer employees. Tanga lived and
worked for Quantity Services in Hoboken, New Jersey. It was now January
of 2010 and the Saratoga Springs racing season in upstate New York
was
beginning preparations for its upcoming racing season.
The racing
officials and Saratoga Springs Chamber of Commerce traditionally
presented several special dinner parties and extravagant catered
affairs for various officials, celebrities, and the public. When
Quantity Services announced to their employees the next special event
was going to be in Saratoga Springs and an extra 75 employees would be
needed to staff the event, Tanga volunteered.
Once relocated in Saratoga Springs, Tanga and her
fellow employees
went to work. They normally worked from 7 in the morning until 7 or 8
in the evening. Inasmuch as many of the transferred employees, like
Tanga, were hourly employees, they received their hourly wages and
time-and-a-half for any hours over 40 each week.
Tanga had been living and working in Saratoga
Springs for almost two
months. One day, while being moved, a
food-heating lamp exploded. As it
did chards of glass were expelled in all directions within a 10 foot
radius.
Although some other employees located nearby were
hit by some of the
chards of glass, Tanga
suffered the most serious injuries. When the
chards of glass were expelled, several of them were projected directly
into Tanga's right arm. The glass cut her arm from her elbow to the
shoulder area, and the heat from the glass burned her right hand as
well as part of her right arm. Several employees immediately came to
Tanga's aid. Tanga was in great pain and
discomfort and was having
difficulty breathing.
One of the managers heard the cries of the injured
employees and
responded almost immediately. He called 911, and within minutes Fire
and Rescue Units were on the scene. They treated all of the injured
employees.
Only Tanga was injured seriously enough to require
transfer
by ambulance to the local hospital's emergency room. Upon her arrival,
she was treated for second degree burns to her right hand and parts of
her right arm. She remained in the hospital for two days for treatment
and observation.
The treating physician told Tanga she was not to
use her right hand
for at least 90 days. Tanga's hand was bandaged and protected by a poly
fabric shield. Quantity Services paid Tanga's emergency room and
hospital bill. They also arranged for another employee to fly with
Tanga back to New Jersey.
Several
days after returning home, Tanga
filed a workers compensation claim with Quantity Service's
workers
comp insurance carrier. At the time Tanga had every reason to
believe her workers compensation
claim would be administered properly,
fairly, and expeditiously. She did not contemplate having to file a
workers comp lawsuit.
After filing her claim, Tanga was sent to one of
the dermatologists
on the employer's approved list of treating physicians. After assessing
Tanga's burns and the healing progression, the dermatologist suggested
to the workers compensation insurance carrier Tanga be sent to an
approved plastic surgeon. The dermatologist made it clear to the
insurance carrier and Tanga's employer Tanga could not return to her
work duties for a minimum of 90 days.
Tanga next consulted with the company approved
plastic surgeon.
After assessing Tanga's injuries, the plastic surgeon made it clear
Tanga would require several skin grafts to her right hand. The plastic
surgeon agreed with the dermatologist's diagnosis and
prognosis for
Tanga's recovery. The plastic surgeon confirmed Tanga would be unable
to return to her work duties for a period of at least 90 days at which
time she would be reassessed.
Tanga
was told her partial salary reimbursement would equal 66% of
her normal wages.
The workers compensation insurance carrier
informed
Tanga her partial wage allowance was based solely on her hourly wages
and did not include the
additional amount of money she had been
receiving for her housing allowance in Saratoga Springs.
Tanga was adamant. She told the carrier and her
employer she should
not be unfairly deprived of the additional monies. Tanga said her
injuries were not her fault
and "but for" the employer's hot lamps
exploding she would still be in Saratoga Springs earning her hourly
wages and receiving the additional housing income she desperately
needed.
The insurance carrier continued to base their
partial wage reimbursement only on Tanga's wages, and not on any amount
other than her hourly wages. Tanga refused to accept their decision and
retained a workers compensation attorney.
The attorney immediately
filed a workers comp lawsuit. The attorney also filed a separate
product
liability case against the manufacturer of the heating lamp.
The Workers Comp Lawsuit...
Because of the court's overloaded docket Tanga's
lawsuit against the
workers compensation insurance carrier didn't reach trial until August
of 2011.
Tanga testified her understanding of the housing
allowance was
that it was additional money for the work she performed as a server at
the special events. She said she traveled from Hoboken to Saratoga
Springs to make more money. She knew she would make more money
in
overtime work and would also make even more money from the housing
allowance she could save while living with several other female
employees in one hotel room.
Quantity
Service's attorneys cross-examined Tanga. They previously
subpoenaed a copy of her recently filed federal tax return. They
presented it to her and asked her to point out where on the form she
declared any amount of money for the overtime work she was paid during
the previous tax year. They also asked her to point out where in the
form she listed her income from the housing allowance she received
before being injured...Tanga couldn't do either.
Outcome
Minutes later, after an impromptu meeting, Tanga's
attorney
Non-Suited their workers comp lawsuit, meaning they dismissed their own case.
Important
Points...
- Workers compensation partial wage
reimbursement is based solely on
wages and cannot be based upon any other form of allowance
unless
specifically approved by the insurance carrier.
- If an employee is injured in
the job by an independent means the
employee may be entitled to partial wage reimbursement, and additional
amounts secured from a product
liability action against a third
party.
|
|
*This
case example is for educational purposes only. It is based on actual
events although names have been changed to protect those involved. Any
resemblance to real persons or entities is purely coincidental.
|
Return
from Workers Comp Lawsuit to Workers
Compensation Law
Return
from Workers Comp Lawsuit to Personal
Injury Settlement Guide
The accuracy of information on this site is not guaranteed. Information on this site is strictly opinion and should not be considered formal legal advice. Under no circumstances should the information on this site be used to make decisions about the proper course of a legal matter. Click below to read our full User Agreement, Disclaimer and Copyright Information.

|