Whiplash Settlement Case Where Both Parties Agree to Settle After a
Hung
Jury*
Case
Summary:
This is a review of a whiplash settlement which
resulted after a state district court trial ended with a deadlocked
jury.
Instead of retrying the case which could've taken nearly a year, both
sides agreed to a cash settlement for the plaintiff.
The settlement compensation
was for an incident
where an employee
driving a company car side swiped another car, causing that car to flip
over. The driver of the
other car suffered injuries to her head and
neck and had to be transported by ambulance to an emergency room.
After extensive negotiations broke down and the
two sides were
unable to come to a settlement agreement, the injured driver filed a
lawsuit against the driver and her employer. The trial ended in a "hung
jury". Rather than wait to reach a second trial date both sides decided
to come to an agreement for a whiplash settlement.
Statement of Facts...
On February 3rd, 2011, Alexis Shiro was on her way
to classes at
American National Community College. Shiro commuted to classes daily
from her home. It was about 8:30 in the morning and the weather was
clear. Shiro was driving south on Wintergate Avenue.
As she was driving, Shiro stopped at a red light
at the corner of
Wintergate Avenue and Riordan Drive. Also stopped at the light was
Susan
Atwater. The evidence showed Atwater had been texting her boyfriend for
the last 3 to 4 minutes before coming to a stop at the corner.
Both drivers were preparing to make a right-hand
turn on to Riordan
Drive, and the intersection had two lanes specifically designated for
right turns. Shiro was in the outer right turn lane, and Atwater was in
the inner lane, closer to the sidewalk.
After the light changed, both drivers commenced
their turn. Atwater continued to text message her boyfriend, and while
distracted by the
texting Atwater allowed her vehicle to drift to the left, out of her
lane and into Shiro's.
As
Atwater continued to drift, she suddenly, and without any warning
to Shiro, struck Shiro's vehicle on the passenger side.
The impact of
the collision forced Shiro's vehicle into the concrete
embankment
separating Wintergate Avenue from Riordan Drive. The concrete
embankment
ran for about 100 feet and down the side of Riordan Drive. It served as
a buffer between the on-ramp from Wintergate Avenue onto Riordan
Drive.
The
force of the impact caused Shiro's vehicle to flip over.
As it
came to a rest, Shiro was unconscious. Several vehicles stopped and ran
to her aid. Other witnesses to the collision called 911. Within minutes
the local Fire and Rescue was on the scene. They were able to extricate
Shiro from the vehicle.
The paramedics stabilized Shiro, "boarded" her,
and transferred her by ambulance to the local hospital's emergency
room. There she was treated for neck and shoulder injuries.
Shiro
was released the next day from the hospital. She was
diagnosed
as having suffered a whiplash
injury to her neck and shoulders. The
doctors prescribed pain medication and muscle relaxers. They also
ordered her to wear a cervical collar for a period of three weeks, at
which time they would re-evaluate her. The doctors advised her not to
return to work until they released her from their care.
At the time of her release from the hospital,
Shiro had already
incurred $8,000 in medical bills. She estimated her future medical
bills, out of pocket expenses, and lost wages to be an additional
$12,000.
Overwhelmed with hospital and personal bills, and
already the
target of collection agencies for those bills she was unable to pay,
Shiro made an appointment with a local personal injury attorney. Her
attorney first attempted to negotiate a whiplash settlement with the
Dakhar's insurance company, but to no avail.
The personal
injury attorney filed suit against Atwater and her
employer Dakhar Packaging Company, Inc. whose car she was driving at
the time of the incident.
The lawsuit
asked for an award of $100,000.
Pre-trial discovery
ensued and the case was set for trial. Both parties appeared for trial
and a jury was selected. The trial began on July 11th, 2011. Both sides
presented their cases.
Shiro's attorneys presented medical testimony in
the form of
verified medical affidavits, related medical bills, the treating
physicians' diagnoses and prognoses, and all medical charts in any way
related to Shiro.
Shiro also testified, telling the jury how the
injury
devastated her physically and personally. She said as a result of the
collision she missed a majority of her classes and would have to repeat
an entire semester. She also told the jury she lost her part time job
as a waitress. She further testified that since the collision she was
unable to sleep and suffered continuing pain and discomfort.
The Whiplash Settlement...
When both sides completed presenting their
evidence, the case went
to the jury. The jury was charged by the presiding judge with the task
of deciding:
- Whether Atwater's negligence was a direct and
proximate cause of Shiro's injuries; and
- If Atwater's
negligence
was the direct and proximate cause of Shiro's injuries, what
amount of money Atwater and Dakhar should pay Shiro as
compensation for her actual medical bills, out of pocket expenses, lost
wages, and pain and suffering.
After
3 days of testimony the case went to the
jury. The jury
deliberated for 8 hours and was unable to reach a verdict.
The next day
the jury returned. After another 3 hours they sent a note to the judge
saying they were hopelessly deadlocked.
The Judge had no choice but to
declare a mistrial.
Realizing it would take 9 months to a year before
the court could
schedule another trial date, both sides entered again into serious
whiplash
settlement negotiations. Both
sides knew the retrial of the case would
not only take up to a year, but might result in another deadlocked
jury.
Wanting to avoid
the lengthy wait for another trial, they eventually agreed on a
whiplash settlement in
the amount of $65,000.
Important
Points...
- For many years the claims of
whiplash victims
were considered to
be no more than desperate attempts of automobile collision victims to
secure money from insurance companies. Those claims of whiplash
injuries have now been supported by medical evidence - evidence which
lends credibility to victims' claims of serious pain and discomfort
suffered during vehicular collisions.
- Many states have recently enacted
strict laws
prohibiting operators
of motor vehicles from using their cell phones while driving.
The laws
cover not only talking on cell
phones while driving, but texting as
well. Violations of the cell phone statutes can now include the
imposition of heavy fines, with the second conviction resulting in the
suspension of their driver's license.
|
|
*This
case example is for educational purposes only. It is based on actual
events although names have been changed to protect those involved. Any
resemblance to real persons or entities is purely coincidental.
|
Return
from Whiplash Settlement to Auto Accident
Claim
Return
from Whiplash Settlement to Personal
Injury Settlement Guide
The accuracy of information on this site is not guaranteed. Information on this site is strictly opinion and should not be considered formal legal advice. Under no circumstances should the information on this site be used to make decisions about the proper course of a legal matter. Click below to read our full User Agreement, Disclaimer and Copyright Information.

|