| |
Child Personal
Injury Suit
Playground
Accident Case Study
The following personal injury suit example illustrates several
important legal
issues regarding negligence and product liability in a playground
accident. It reviews the
accident, liability,
injuries, settlement
negotiations, and the final case resolution.
The
Accident...
A six-year-old child was playing on the playground at a private
school. A bench had been placed under a jungle gym the
previous week while the children watched a performance on the adjacent
school field and it had never been removed. This allowed children to
climb upon a glider which they normally could not reach ("but for" the
bench being there).
The glider is similar to a zipline in that children hold onto
a handle with both hands at one end and either kick off with their feet
or they are pushed to the other end by a fellow classmate. The handle
is secured to a metal track with rollers and it flies across the track
at a high rate of speed. The glider was approximately 7½ feet
above the
ground.
The child was pushed too hard and
flew to the ground placing her hands out to avoid landing on her face.
She contacted the ground with her right hand and stomach, causing a
compound break to two bones in her wrist and arm.
Liability...
This personal injury suit poses two interesting scenarios for liability, one under a
negligence theory and one under a products liability theory for failure
to warn.
Negligence
Theory:
From the first perspective the
school is charged
with making regular inspections of their property, identifying dangers
and either warning of
them or removing them. When the bench was placed under the
glider for
extra seating it should have been removed immediately afterwards,
however it was
allowed to remain for several days.
Because the bench was
there, a child who was too young and too small was able to gain access
to the glider which she normally could not reach. Once she
was holding the handle, the drop to the ground was too severe for
someone of her age and weight causing injury.
The second
theory of negligence liability rests in failure to supervise.
Schools are
also charged with having sufficient playground supervision
to ensure that children are safe and using equipment for its designed
purpose. On this particular day, there was no
adult
supervising the playground area, yet children were permitted to play
there.
Product
Liability Theory:
Lastly, products liability holds manufacturers of
equipment strictly liable for injuries that occur when individuals use
their products. Liability
occurs under several scenarios, but
here it would be failure
to warn.
Had the manufacturer of the
jungle gym placed a warning that children under a certain age, height
or weight restriction should not be permitted to use the equipment,
this would have put the school on notice that a six-year-old should not
gain access to the glider. There was no such
warning.
So even though the six-year-old gained access from a
bench, this is a foreseeable situation and failure to warn still makes
the manufacturer liable for a personal injury suit.
Injuries...
Playground
injuries account for more than 20% of emergency room visits
with compound breaks and fractures being the most common.
However,
other more unfortunate situations can include more serious breaks,
brain and neck injuries and even death.
In this personal injury suit example the child
experienced a compound fracture to her wrist and arm.
Negotiations...
The child was transported to the hospital by the school secretary so
there was no ambulance expense. The emergency room costs
totaled $5,300 including the private orthopedic surgeon who was
called to the ER to re-set the arm.
Her subsequent visit to
the orthopedist one week later for casting totaled $450 (although
insurance was used). Her mother also opted for a water-proof
cast which was not covered by insurance resulting in an out-of-pocket
expense of $50.
Therefore, her total medical "special damages" were
$5,800. Her mother hired an attorney who demanded
$23,200 from the school and $50,000 in a products liability
action against the manufacturer.
Final Settlement...
The school’s insurance settled with the family for
$20,000. Even though they had insurance, they needed to
reimburse the insurance company through a process called
indemnity. Insurance companies will typically settle for less
than the total medical bill however, and mother was able to settle the
reimbursement claims for $3,000. Also, in some states, in claims
dealing
with minors, the attorney can only take a 20% fee.
The products
liability claim was more difficult to settle. They initially
questioned liability due to the fact that the bench was the main cause
of the accident. At the end of the day, however the
manufacturer of the playground equipment settled for $25,000 with
the family.
Important
Points...
-
Playground injuries can be severe but children still need to be able to
play and enjoy their recreational time at school. The best advice is to
inspect on your own,
the
playground and equipment your child will have access to. Make
a
determination on your own about whether it seems safe.
-
Most schools should keep incident reports, so don’t be afraid to ask
what, if any, accidents have occurred.
- Do
your research. A simple google search of “glider accidents” will reveal
how dangerous this one particular piece of playground equipment
is. This may save you or another parent from a trip to the
ER.
Return
from Personal Injury Suit to Product Liability Lawsuit
Return
from Personal Injury Suit to Personal
Injury Settlement Guide
The accuracy of information on this site is not guaranteed. Information on this site is strictly opinion and should not be considered formal legal advice. Under no circumstances should the information on this site be used to make decisions about the proper course of a legal matter. Click below to read our full User Agreement, Disclaimer and Copyright Information.

|