Nursing Home Negligence Lawsuit Alleging Inadequate Care*
Summary:
This is a review of a nursing home negligence
lawsuit in which an elderly female patient was alleged to have been
denied the medications
prescribed by her physician. The lawsuit claimed that at the time of
her admittance to the nursing home the woman had a legitimate
prescription for two painkillers and that employees of the nursing home
stole the medication for their own personal use.
As the result of the abrupt denial of medication,
the woman not only
endured excessive
pain from a previous injury, but also
life-threatening side effects from withdrawal. The lawsuit further
contended that the facility's inability or unwillingness to properly
monitor its staff and its patients amounted to nursing home
negligence.
Statement of Facts...
Up until her fall, Dorothy Palmer had been able to
live by herself
in a small two bedroom home. She had lived in this house for the past
three years, ever since the passing of her husband John Palmer.
Although under a doctor’s care for diminishing sight, Dorothy
was otherwise in remarkably good health.
On January 1st, 2011, at about 2:30 in the
afternoon, Dorothy was
returning from her daily constitutional around her block. She knew most
of the people who lived near her and felt comfortable and safe around
them.
As
she climbed the three brick steps up to her front door she
slipped and fell. Luckily, a neighbor saw her fall and
rushed to her
aid. Dorothy said she was in severe pain and needed to go to the
hospital. Another neighbor ran over to help while calling 911. Fire and
Rescue responded within minutes. Dorothy was stabilized and transported
by ambulance to Amesworth Memorial Hospital.
Once in the emergency room Dorothy was sedated and
administered
Stadol for her pain. The on-call emergency physician ordered an MRI
examination and a CAT scan.
The results of the examinations indicated Dorothy
suffered a
fractured left clavicle. Dorothy remained in the hospital for 48 hours.
After being cleared by the attending physician, Dorothy was released
into her son Jonathan’s care. Jonathan had previously made
arrangements for his mother to be admitted to Sunny Day Senior
Residence,
a facility which could handle patients with a range of medical
needs.
Dorothy
was admitted to Sunny Day on March 3rd, 2011.
Dorothy’s personal physician, Dr. Tutrone, came to visit her the
next day. He reviewed Sunny Day’s Chart and prescribed the
painkiller Vicodin ES and the muscle relaxant Alprazolam. Dr. Tutrone
ordered that Dorothy remain on the same medications and dosages until
further notice.
Over the next week Dorothy seemed to be recovering
well but by March
9th, Jonathan couldn’t help but notice his mother had taken a
turn for the worse. She appeared agitated and was perspiring profusely.
She said she couldn’t sleep and her bones ached. She was
suffering from muscle spasms as well.
Jonathan asked Dr, Tutrone if he might stop by to
see his mother
since at this point Jonathan was quite concerned about his
mother’s rapid deterioration. Dr. Tutrone agreed and during his
visit he examined Dorothy and drew her blood for tests.
The results of
these tests surprised Dr. Tutrone. His surprise quickly turned to anger
because Dorothy’s blood
results were negative for
benzodiazepines and opiates. With the dosages of
Vicodin and Alprazolam
he prescribed for Dorothy, it would have been impossible for her blood
not to be positive for both of these classes of drugs.
Jonathan contacted the Police. They commenced a
criminal
investigation. The investigation uncovered a scheme involving one
Registered Nurse and one Licensed Vocational Nurse at the home. Both
nurses
were complicit in denying patients much of their prescribed
medications, especially benzodiazepines and opiates.
In an effort to
divert attention away from their scheme, the nurses had substituted
vitamins for the narcotics. Both
nurses were arrested and charged with
Felony Possession of Narcotics with Intent to Deliver, and Felony Abuse
of the Elderly.
The Lawsuit...
On
behalf of his mother, Jonathan filed a
lawsuit against Sunny Day. In his nursing home negligence
lawsuit, Jonathan
pointed to the acute
pain his mother was unnecessarily subjected to by the nurses and their
employer, Sunny Day. The lawsuit contended Sunny Day breached the
“Standard of Care” they owed to Dorothy. Their passive
acknowledgment of the nurses' actions, the suit contended, amounted to
negligence.
During his sworn testimony at trial Dr. Tutrone
stated with a
“high degree of medical certainty” the denial of her
prescribed medication caused Dorothy to suffer life threatening
symptoms such as:
- Acute Anxiety
- Prolonged Insomnia
- Muscle Spasms
- Psychosis
- Suicidal Ideation
- Grand Mal Seizures
Dr. Tutrone testified Dorothy should have been
titrated slowly off
the medications. He testified she must have suffered terrible pain and
discomfort equal to, or more than a person undergoing withdrawal from
heroin. He said it was miraculous she survived the ordeal.
Since
the filing of the nursing home negligence lawsuit, Dorothy’s health
deteriorated rapidly. She was confined to her home and
unable to
testify in the suit. Although impossible to
prove, Dr. Tutrone testified he
believed the rapid and uncontrolled sudden narcotic withdrawal placed a
tremendous strain on Dorothy’s organs. Her improper and
untitrated opiate and benzodiazepine withdrawal could easily be the
cause of her health’s continued deterioration.
Sunny Day’s attorneys
called Sunny Day’s Nursing
Administrator to testify. The administrator testified Sunny Day
exercised all methods of Standard Reasonable Care to insure
Dorothy’s health was protected. The Administrator
testified the
nurses involved had clean records and had offered no
previous evidence
of wrongdoing.
Sunny Day’s attorneys next called to testify two
additional
nurses who alternated in caring for Dorothy. They testified Dorothy
never complained to them about her condition. They said if she had
complained, standard procedure would have been for them to report those
complaints to the Nursing Supervisor.
They further testified each time
they came on duty they checked Dorothy’s chart. At all times the
chart showed Dorothy had been administered her Vicodin ES and
Alprazolam. If the chart omitted the administration of those
medications, that too they said would have been reported to their
Supervisor.
Outcome...
After hearing the testimony, reviewing the
evidence and hearing the
arguments of counsel
for both parties in this nursing home negligence lawsuit, the
Court ruled as follows:
In the case of those of us who become
infirm and rely upon the
promises of the very institutions which solicit the elderly and the
children of the infirm with promises of medical care and supervision,
we must hold those medical care facilities to a very high
standard.
Sunny
Day wholly failed to maintain and provide that standard of
care we believed necessary to protect the plaintiff
Dorothy Palmer.
As a result, we hold for the Plaintiff and against the
Defendant.
Important
Points...
- Medical institutions are held
to a very high standard of reasonable
care when it involves their patients. Even the criminal activity of an
employee will normally not excuse a medical care provider from its duty
to insure the sanctity of their patients’ medical care.
- If a court finds a defendant
has breached the "Standard of Care," it
is an almost certainty that it will award damages
to the plaintiff.
|
|
*This
case example is for educational purposes only. It is based on actual
events although names have been changed to protect those involved. Any
resemblance to real persons or entities is purely coincidental.
|
Return
from Nursing Home Negligence Lawsuit to Elderly
Abuse
Return
from Nursing Home Negligence Lawsuit to Personal
Injury Settlement Guide
The accuracy of information on this site is not guaranteed. Information on this site is strictly opinion and should not be considered formal legal advice. Under no circumstances should the information on this site be used to make decisions about the proper course of a legal matter. Click below to read our full User Agreement, Disclaimer and Copyright Information.

|