logo for injury-settlement-guide.com
Home
Ask a Question
FREE Case Review
Required Reading: How Claims Work
Basic P.I. Concepts
Who's at Fault?
After the Accident
Compensation
How to Negotiate
Accepting the Offer
Filing a Lawsuit
Hiring Your Lawyer
Extra Info
Case Types: Car Accidents
Product Liability
Medical Malpractice
Mesothelioma
Slip and Falls
Dog Attacks
Nursing Home Abuse
Workers Comp
Wrongful Death
Other Case Types
More Info: State Laws
Guests' Articles
About
Site Updates
Share This Site
Accident Form

Subscribe To This Site
XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines
leftimage for injury-settlement-guide.com
 

Dog Bite Claim Where a Dog Bit a Woman on the Thigh Causing Her To Fall*

In this dog bite claim, plantiff Vonda Carber appealed an order to dismiss her original claim against the defendant Petter's Home (which also included PetsRPups animal supplies).

Plaintiff Carber alleged she was injured when one of several canines - being shown for adoption by Petter's Home - attacked her. The dog bit her on her coat and thigh, causing her to fall.

The incident happened on the sidewalk in front of the PetsRpups store.

In order to recover for a dog bite claim or attack, the plaintiff must be able to show proof that the dog had vicious propensities. They must further prove that the dog's owner, or the person controlling the premises where the dog was, knew or should have known about the nasty disposition of the dog.

Vicious propensities refer to any act that "might endanger the safety of the persons and property of others in a given situation."

The defendants in this dog bite claim offered proof that the dog in question had been shown at least 30 times previously without incident. It was stated she was considered to be a sweet and easily shown dog who had no history of biting or jumping on anyone. It was further stated the dog had not shown any aggressiveness.

This information led the court to conclude that the defendants had no prior notice of any vicious propensities.

The plaintiff's reply did not give enough evidence to raise a question as to whether or not the dog had vicious propensities.

In this dog bite claim the court decided the plaintiff could not recover damages on the cause of common-law negligence.

*This case example is for educational purposes only. It is based on actual events although names have been changed to protect those involved.



Return from Dog Bite Claim to Dog Attacks

Return from Dog Bite Claim to Personal Injury Settlement Guide Personal Injury Areas

How Much Is Your Case Worth?
Find out NOW! Complete this form for a FREE case
review by an experienced attorney...



The accuracy of information on this site is not guaranteed. Information on this site is strictly opinion and should not be considered formal legal advice. Under no circumstances should the information on this site be used to make decisions about the proper course of a legal matter.Click below to read our full User Agreement, Disclaimer and Copyright Information.

footer for injury settlement page