logo for injury-settlement-guide.com
Home
Ask a Question
FREE Case Review
Claim Guide: How Claims Work
Basic P.I. Concepts
Who's at Fault?
After the Accident
Compensation
How to Negotiate
Accepting the Offer
Filing a Lawsuit
Hiring Your Lawyer
Extra Info
Case Types: Car Accidents
Slip and Falls
Workers Comp
Product Liability
Dog Attacks
Medical Malpractice
Wrongful Death
Nursing Home Abuse
Mesothelioma
Other Case Types
More Info: Demand Letters
State Laws
Accident Form
Site Updates
Attorney Directory
Guest Articles
Share This Site
About/Contact
Sitemap

Subscribe To This Site
XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines
leftimage for injury-settlement-guide.com
 
Ask an Attorney a Question for FREE!

Denying Liability in a Parking Lot Car Accident...

by John
(Fl)

I was in a parked car in a parking lot, opened my door and was hit by another car trying to come in to the space next to me and avoid shopping carriages in that space. My door was hit knocking me back in to the car and causing injury.

The insurance carrier for the person that hit me said they would be responsible for the damage, that the driver was at fault. Then two days later said that I was just as much at fault when I opened my door.

I have been to the doctor and he is concerned about my injury. Not sure if my bills will be paid and any long term effects I might end up with. Any information would be helpful.

I am losing sensation in my left limbs and having difficulty concentrating and having problems with incontinence. The doctor is doing a brain scan and has done some MRI's. I think it might be myostisis neuropathy. Can I do anything to get them to pay? Thank you, John

Disclaimer: Information provided in your response is not formal legal advice, it is generic legal information and is based on the very limited information given in your question. You should always get a formal case evaluation from a licensed attorney.

Comments for
Denying Liability in a Parking Lot Car Accident...

Click here to add your own comments

Contributory Negligence
by: Law Lady

Florida is a pure comparative fault state. (See this page on Florida personal injury law for more information on the laws applicable in your state.)

What this means is that the adjuster will review your claim and compare the fault of both parties. Apparently the adjuster thinks you were as much to blame as the other party, however this does not preclude payment of your bills but rather a reduction in what you would be entitled to.

In pure comparative fault jurisdictions fault is assessed up to 99%, so even with the fact that you were 50% at fault (if you were), you should still receive some compensation.

I would advise the adjuster of this information and show that you know what you are talking about. Often this will change their tune.

Since laws change frequently and across jurisdictions you should get a personalized case evaluation from an attorney licensed in your state (if you haven't already). Find an experienced local attorney to give you a FREE personalized case review here.


Best of luck,

Law Guy


----------------

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Ask a Personal Injury Legal Question




How Much Is Your Case Worth?
Find out NOW! Complete this form for a FREE case
review by an experienced attorney...



The accuracy of information on this site is not guaranteed. Information on this site is strictly opinion and should not be considered formal legal advice. Under no circumstances should the information on this site be used to make decisions about the proper course of a legal matter. Click below to read our full User Agreement, Disclaimer and Copyright Information.

footer for injury settlement page

Bookmark and Share