logo for injury-settlement-guide.com
Home
Ask a Question
FREE Case Review
Required Reading: How Claims Work
Basic P.I. Concepts
Who's at Fault?
After the Accident
Compensation
How to Negotiate
Accepting the Offer
Filing a Lawsuit
Hiring Your Lawyer
Extra Info
Case Types: Car Accidents
Product Liability
Medical Malpractice
Mesothelioma
Slip and Falls
Dog Attacks
Nursing Home Abuse
Workers Comp
Wrongful Death
Other Case Types
More Info: State Laws
Guests' Articles
About
Accident Form
Site Updates

Subscribe To This Site
XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines
leftimage for injury-settlement-guide.com
 

Brain Injury Lawsuit Filed Against Several Doctors for Medical Malpractice*

In this brain injury lawsuit the executor of the deceased's estate is seeking damages from several doctors and other medical personnel who cared for the deceased while she was in the hospital. Due to alleged medical errors the patient sustained brain injuries and died.

The plaintiffs in this brain injury lawsuit are Moira Ace as the executor of Connie Aspen (deceased). The defendants are 12 doctors, one nurse and one hospital.

This is a motion seeking damages for medical malpractice. The plaintiff alleges the defendants were negligent in their care of the deceased while she was in the hospital from February 1, 2000 to March 15th, 2000.

The specific complaint is that the defendants failed to prevent the deceased's extubation and failed to monitor her oxygen levels after extubation to make sure they were adequate. Further that these negligent oversights cause anoxia and significant brain damage. This incident preceded the filing of this brain injury lawsuit.

The court said the plaintiff has to make a prima facie "showing of entitlement to judgment by providing sufficient evidence to show the absence of material issues of fact."

The judge further indicated that failure to make such a case would mean the denial of their motion no matter what the opposing papers said. If on the other hand they meet their burden, it shifts to the opposing party to prove the existence of a material issue of fact.

The required elements of proof in a medical malpractice action are "a deviation from accepted practice and evidence that the departure was the proximate cause of injury or damages."

The court concluded the defendants in this brain injury lawsuit failed to meet their burden of proof, as they did not offer evidence in an admissible form. Their motion was therefore denied.

The court noted there was an irony in this situation in that if the defendants had met their burden, it would have shifted back to the plaintiff and the plaintiff would not have met her burden of proof.

*This case example is for educational purposes only. It is based on actual events although names have been changed to protect those involved.



Return from Brain Injury Lawsuit to Medical Malpractice Cases

Return from Brain Injury Lawsuit to Personal Injury Settlement Guide Personal Injury Areas

How Much Is Your Case Worth?
Find out NOW! Complete this form for a FREE case
review by an experienced attorney...



The accuracy of information on this site is not guaranteed. Information on this site is strictly opinion and should not be considered formal legal advice. Under no circumstances should the information on this site be used to make decisions about the proper course of a legal matter.Click below to read our full User Agreement, Disclaimer and Copyright Information.

footer for injury settlement page