 |
| |
Auto Accident Settlements and Duty of Care
Getting fair offers for auto accident settlements often relies on
clearly
establishing Duty of Care.
It's one of the cornerstones of any liability
claim.
We’ll use the example of an auto collision as we explore this
concept.
(Auto collisions are often straightforward cases because the law is
very specific with almost all
aspects of driving, so defining someone’s duty is usually easy.)
The idea
behind Duty of Care is this:
Every one of us has an obligation to act in a way
that will not injure anyone else. When driving a car we all have a
responsibility
to act within the law and, beyond that, act like any reasonable person
would in order to look out for the safety of others. This includes
cyclists, pedestrians and other drivers.
In many auto accident settlements cases there is a clear duty of care
at play. Drivers
have to signal turns, they have to stop at stop signs, they have to
obey traffic signals and they have to observe the speed limits.
After an accident you have to determine whether or not that duty of
care was upheld. If not it's referred to as breach of duty.
Anyone who is determined to have a breach of duty is negligent in an
accident, and therefore liable.
This is not only an important factor in determining liability in a car
accident, it also plays on the basic rights of citizens. One of the key
factors that makes our society work is that we know that we all have a
duty of care towards each other and we all have to uphold that duty.
Individuals who choose to pursue auto accident settlements on their own
should use these legal terms when talking to the insurance adjuster.
If you know that the
accident was caused because the other person made an illegal u-turn
then you should state that the “liability”
falls on them because their
“duty of care”
was to not make that u-turn.
Use the words sparingly and
in context. The idea is to let the adjuster know that you understand
how auto accident settlements work and you won’t be strung along.
In pretty much any type of auto collision
there is a duty of care at play, but it doesn’t
necessarily fall on the
driver.
The breach of duty may be a result of the municipality failing
to mark an obstacle or not properly maintaining the roads.
In other personal injury cases there might be no duty of care at all.
If the accident happened after entering a room marked “Danger - Keep
Out” then the property owner can argue they had no duty of care towards
you.
It's important to realize right from the start that if this
responsibility
doesn’t exist, your claim won't be successful.
Return
from Auto Accident Settlements to Personal
Injury Settlements
Return
from Auto Accident Settlements to the Personal
Injury Settlement Guide
Personal Injury Areas
The accuracy of information on this site is not guaranteed. Information on this site is strictly opinion and should not be considered formal legal advice. Under no circumstances should the information on this site be used to make decisions about the proper course of a legal matter.Click below to read our full User Agreement, Disclaimer and Copyright Information.

|
|